Friday, April 29, 2016
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Advanced Consultative Selling: Selling in the Blue Ocean
By Mike Schultz
For the last 50 or so years, consultative selling has been the go-to approach for most sellers.In traditional consultative selling, the buyer states a need and the seller positions their offerings as solutions to problems. This used to be enough to win the sale. But today’s buyers often perceive sellers and their capabilities to be somewhat interchangeable.1 This leaves sellers stuck in a capabilities battle, fighting price pressure.
The traditional consultative sale, with the need defined by the buyer, looks like this:
So what can sellers do to break out of this echo chamber, avoid discounting, and differentiate themselves to win more often?
W. Chan Kim and Renée Maugorgne, the authors of Blue Ocean Strategy, one of the most popular business books in recent memory, argue that companies "succeed not by battling competitors, but rather by creating 'blue oceans' of uncontested market space. They assert that these strategic moves create a leap in value for the company, its buyers, and its employees while making the competition irrelevant."23
In sales, this means that sellers need to create a surge in value for the buyer. When they do so, they make themselves categorically distinct. This is where the future of consultative selling comes in. (Read our latest white paper on this topic, The Future of Consultative Selling.)
Sellers who win go beyond traditional consultative selling. They inspire buyers with new ideas and perspectives. They question the status quo and don’t let buyer’s accept it, thus redefining the buyer’s reality and widening the possibilities by creating these ‘blue oceans.’
We call this kind of advanced consultative selling Insight Selling. We’ve written a lot about Insight Selling, which we define as the process of creating and winning sales opportunities, and inspiring buyers and driving change, with ideas that matter.
Read more: What is Insight Selling?
When sellers build on the traditional consultative selling approach and add insight, several things happen:
- Sellers redefine the need
- Buyer perception of value they can realize is expanded by the seller; the seller maximizes the impact potential
- Other sellers continue to fight over the originally stated need; the Insight Seller is selling a significantly different solution to a changed buyer perception of need
RAIN and the Blue Ocean
Since we first unveiled it in 2003, RAIN Selling has been our core consultative selling methodology. It’s about maximizing buyer value by discovering and solving hidden need along with stated need, and helping buyers visualize the most desireable New Reality for them. Our RAIN Selling model looks like this:In doing so, you will unleash impact and value unexpectedly. You will be categorically different from other sellers, putting yourself in the best postion to win because of the value you, as a seller, bring to the table.
1. Mike Schultz and John Doerr, What Sales Winners Do Differently (RAIN Group, 2013).
2. W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne, Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant (Harvard Business Review Press, 2005).
3. Wikipedia contributors, "Blue Ocean Strategy," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Ocean_Strategy.
2. W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne, Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make Competition Irrelevant (Harvard Business Review Press, 2005).
3. Wikipedia contributors, "Blue Ocean Strategy," Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Ocean_Strategy.
The Green Box Exercise
I lead a T.E.C. Canada group which
comprises CEOs and Presidents of both private and publicly traded organizations. Member companies in my group are found listed
in the top 250 companies on the 2015 ROB Top 1000, in the top 1/3 of 2015
Profit 500, in Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500™ and have been finalists in Ernst
Young’s “Entrepreneur of The Year Awards” for 2014 and 2015.
Joining T.E.C. Canada has enabled the leaders of
these organizations, as a team, to share their drive and commitment to enrich
each other’s ability to achieve their individual business, professional and
personal goals. Members act as a private board of trusted advisors with no
agendas other than helping each other share best practices, solve management
issues, make better decisions and improve leadership skills.
As a group we often engage
in “exercises” designed to enhance leadership skills, personal development and
business performance. Recently I had the group work on an exercise entitled “The Green Box Exercise”. This exercise
focuses on personal development.
It’s an exercise that has relevance and
benefits for everyone so I thought that I would share it.
The
Green Box Exercise
John
(an Australian) called his son Jim to let him know that he’d be flying to New Zealand the
following day to try to close an important business deal. Jim, a pilot in the Air Guard Reserves warned
his father that potential Typhoons could make travel hazardous. John laughed and reminded Jim that if
anything tragic happened, to remember to get the “Green Box” out of the closet
in his bedroom.
The next
day, John was killed when his plane crashed into the side of a mountain on the
north island in very low visibility.
Several days after the funeral, he remembered his father’s words about
the Green Box. He called his mother and
they brought the Green Box to the family attorney. Inside, they found 28 envelopes. Here are the labels on the envelopes:
- Letter to my Wife
- Letter to each child (3)
- Letter to the employees
- Letter to my mother / father
- List of most important 5 employees in the company & their strengths/weaknesses
- Off balance sheet deals
- Organizational Chart
- Details of any company trusts
- List of personal and business people that should be contacted in the event of passing
- Deals in process and evaluation of them
- Strategy that I am thinking about but haven’t told anybody about
- List of Trusted Advisors and their roles (may or may not be currently working with company) such as attorney, accountant, etc.
- Instructions not addressed in Will
- Copies of POA documents
- Copy of Passport, Birth Certificate
- Copy of all credit cards
- Copy of physical property titles
- Personal stock portfolio information
- Details of Life insurance—personal and company owned
- Details of all other insurance
- Copies of personal property valuations (Jewelry, guns, collectables, etc.)
- Computer passwords
- Personal financial Statement
- Extra passport photos
- Medical/Dental Charts
- Funeral/Burial Instructions
- Mementos and to whom you’d like them given
The Exercise: Start by addressing envelopes, preferably envelopes of a personal and business nature. Remember that this
will be the start of your green box, and people will read these at the time of
your death.
Some of the items are not trivial to build up but, having done it once,
updating becomes a little easier.
Things like passwords and user names are
a huge issue as are having a clearly defined beneficiary for all your
investments. Burial instructions are a source of family strife as are the
disposition of trinkets and mementos.
Please avoid any changes to your will or additions which may void your
will. These should be done by an attorney and properly registered.
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Big data, marketing and decision-making – what is it all about?
I’ve also been fortunate to speak at many conferences where some of the speakers are fully trained ‘big data ninjas’, and I’m lucky to know some of them personally.
Big data is complex information, and it feels as overwhelming as a huge waterfall. It’s only if you present big data in a meaningful way it helps you to make better decisions.
Big data is inconveniently big. It’s hard to handle. Impossible to overview in its raw form.
On Wikipedia, you read: “Big data is a term for data sets that are so large or complex that traditional data processing applications are inadequate. Challenges include analysis, capture, data curation, search, sharing, storage, transfer, visualization, querying and information privacy.”
An acquaintance who is responsible for all digital marketing for a large hotel chain in the US told me about her struggle to start to look at numbers when making decisions. For years, they had been making most decisions based on prejudices, personal experiences, and their ‘gut feeling’.
Every hour their hotels have thousands of guests who are in touch with them, either online, over the phone or staying in one of their large hotels. The information they collect about their customers is big data.
The information they have about their guests comes in many forms. Some are internal data, and some are external. You have access to the data that you asked your guests for before their visit and during their stay, and then new random data that you collect from your guests.
Their challenge was to use all information they have about their customers in a meaningful way so they could make better marketing decisions. To kick this off, they spent several days in a large conference room trying to figure out every possible touch-point that their customers have with them. What they got was a big complex map that told stories about their customers. The map was not easy to overview, or understand. The next step was to set up data collection points that they could follow and then also improve everyone’s web analytics skills.
Analytics is a vital phase of the big data cycle. The most common tools marketers use is Google Analytics, and it tells you about your website visitors. With the help of this information, you can understand what was successful in a campaign and how many online leads it gave. You can analyse your conversion rate, and see how many visits lead to a sale or an inquiry.
It’s when the data shows you meaningful pattern that you can do something with it. To see those patterns in an excel spreadsheet can be hard. That’s why you use visualisation software to do this, there are amazing and beautiful tools that magically help you visualise data.
To start using web analytics in a meaningful way took a while for the hotel chain. It’s not a one-month projects, but more like an on-going continual improvement project where everyone has to be open for new learning and share their knowledge.
Five examples of big data in daily life:
1) The Panama leak was a big and complex project with 11 million documents. And to understand them better, see the pattern the journalists used big data visualisations tool. They used Neo4j and Linkurious to follow a pattern and see where the money went.
2) Eye on the Reef program – people, are helping scientists to find out what’s going on with the reef by sending them updates.
3) The Airports of the Future Project
4) NASA earth image project
5) For the health sector, there is so much to be discovered. Last time when I visited my local GP, or ‘house doctor’ as you say in Swedish, the nurse told me that they keep track on patient’s blood pressure, ‘they give us a call and share their blood pressure weekly, and we add it into the patients journal.’ Right now they collect the information manually. In the future, it will be done over a digital application on your smartphone, and you may send it to your doctor if you wish to.
We will use new personal digital technology in the future. We already have the fitness bracelet and different health apps. We will track all kind of body functions, sleep, movement, pulse, blood pressure, periods, hormones, blood, saliva, and weight. Then we will connect this with our smartphone, and start to see graphics and other visualisation tools, and share this with our doctor. There is a lot of medical issues that you can keep track of and prevent this way.
With so many new digital devices we are collecting and storing more data than ever. One question we need to ponder is how we will use it, and how it can be helpful. More tracking tools will be developed, it will give us more data, and they may help us to make better decisions.
How many people who are working in digital marketing are big data ninjas? Not that many, unfortunately. Big data is complex, and by collaborating and sharing skills you can explore what it means to your organisation.
Monday, April 11, 2016
The Reason Why Corporate Innovation Is So Hard
Innovation is a paradox for all of us. On the one hand you are well
aware that you have to take new roads before you reach the end of the
present dead end street. On the other hand it is incredibly risky. It
takes a lot of time. And it takes a lot of resources. Research shows
that only one out of seven innovation projects gets launched and is
successful. So saying yes to innovation is a step into the unknown. It
creates fear of failure, which causes fear to innovate, especially in
big organisations where a conservative corporate culture prevails.
On average it takes 18 - 36 months to develop a new concept, which often will only be profitable 2-3 years after introduction. Stimulated by short-term targets managers in big corporates focus on 'the business of today'. As innovator you want them to shift money and resources to the business of tomorrow, which is really hard.
Now be honest now: "Do you want to invest your personal savings in a project with a 1 out of 7 chance that it will be successful?" Probably you won't, unless you have to. And that is the real reason why a lot of managers wait until not innovating is not an option anymore. We all are humans.
I like to quote the CEO of BMW AG, the German luxury car producer, Dr.-Ing. Norbert Reithofer. When asked why BMW started the risky E-car project with the BMWi-3 and i-8 he responded very honest: "Because doing nothing was even a bigger risk" [Autoweek 41-2013].
Big corporations have often a very clear mission statement with an emphasis on innovation, a very well organised innovation process and professional innovation departments. Shareholders, board and bosses will however only stick out their necks for innovation if doing nothing is a bigger risk. This is the main reason why corporate innovation is so hard in practice.
So you how can you break the status quo and create momentum for innovation? Make them nervous that doing nothing is indeed a big risk. How? Identify the key persons in your company and confront them personally with concrete reasons for change that will move them out of their comfort zone.
So how can you make your managers nervous?
Go for it! Good luck.
On average it takes 18 - 36 months to develop a new concept, which often will only be profitable 2-3 years after introduction. Stimulated by short-term targets managers in big corporates focus on 'the business of today'. As innovator you want them to shift money and resources to the business of tomorrow, which is really hard.
Now be honest now: "Do you want to invest your personal savings in a project with a 1 out of 7 chance that it will be successful?" Probably you won't, unless you have to. And that is the real reason why a lot of managers wait until not innovating is not an option anymore. We all are humans.
I like to quote the CEO of BMW AG, the German luxury car producer, Dr.-Ing. Norbert Reithofer. When asked why BMW started the risky E-car project with the BMWi-3 and i-8 he responded very honest: "Because doing nothing was even a bigger risk" [Autoweek 41-2013].
Big corporations have often a very clear mission statement with an emphasis on innovation, a very well organised innovation process and professional innovation departments. Shareholders, board and bosses will however only stick out their necks for innovation if doing nothing is a bigger risk. This is the main reason why corporate innovation is so hard in practice.
So you how can you break the status quo and create momentum for innovation? Make them nervous that doing nothing is indeed a big risk. How? Identify the key persons in your company and confront them personally with concrete reasons for change that will move them out of their comfort zone.
So how can you make your managers nervous?
- Take them to visit start-ups challenging your position.
- Invite a trend watcher to confront them how quick the world is changing.
- Visit ex-customers who just changed to a very innovative competitor.
- Take them to Tech Universities to see experiments with new technologies.
- Spam them with articles of new successful business models;
- Visit young customers and ask what they think of your brand and - products.
Go for it! Good luck.
Problem Solving takes a Fearless and Logical Mind
Leroy Wall, Wall Consulting Group
One of the best lines from Ridley Scott’s 2015 blockbuster movie, “The Martian” came as marooned astronaut Mark Watney, played by Matt Damon, faces what appear to be unsolvable problems in his quest to remain alive.Watney’s great line is, “You can either accept [the problem] or get to work. That's all it is. You just begin. You do the math. You solve one problem, then you solve the next one and the next and if you solve enough problems, you get to come home.”
Of course, failing to effectively problem-solve in the financial management sector will not lead to premature death on an alien world, but Watney’s straightforward and logical approach to overcoming what seem to be unsurmountable challenges is worth considering for anyone trying to solve any problem, big or small.
Rarely does anyone know all of the answers when first confronting a big, complex problem.
That can be scary, which is why effective problem-solving requires an appropriate amount of fearlessness combined with logic.
Start by dividing up the problem into what you know and what you don’t know, then begin tackling the unknowns.
That seems simple enough. Use your technical knowledge, education and experience to figure out what you know and don’t know about a problem, and then start applying logic.
Each time you want to take a step
forward in solving your problem, assess the probability that you are
more likely right than wrong about that step, and only that step. Don’t
let the step after that scare you.
Fear is relative, therefore you must establish your comfort level. How confident do you need to be to take that next step? Some people might be comfortable with 80 per cent certainty that they are right while others might need 90 per cent certainty or more. When you determine your own confidence level, take that step forward at a safe pace, allowing for a sober second opinion from a trusted colleague or friend if needed. When you are more likely wrong than right, stay put or step back, reassess and recalibrate as necessary; also allowing for a sober second opinion.
Don’t let fear of failure stop you. Failure is an opportunity to learn, as long as you establish a safe environment for failure and put limits and controls on the allowable level of failure. In this environment, you don’t have to know everything now, each step brings the next step into focus.
Inevitably there will be times when you stop and you simply don’t know what to do next. If you don’t have the answers, you just need to know how to find them. Finding answers becomes easier if you break your big problem into multiple smaller problems and attack them individually.
You should never allow what you don’t know to stop you from moving forward with what you do know. Exploit what you don’t know as an opportunity to make someone else an expert and you the student. You might be surprised by what you will learn.
Cycling through this process over and over eventually moves everything into the known category, and the unknowns just whittle away. Becoming paralyzed by a problem comes from the illogical desire to be self-sufficient and get to a 100 per cent confidence level before each step, which leads to few or no steps being taken.
Let's try this logic on a 6 year-old you are teaching to ride a shiny new bicycle. You know that this child does not yet know how to ride a bicycle. You know that everyone who learns how to ride a bike never forgets. These are things you know. These are things a 4 year-old can comprehend when you explain them. You can also explain that falling down is okay. Everyone falls down when they learn. You can create a safe environment where the child is wearing protective gear, the bike has training wheels, and the child is riding it on a grassy field. Failure is okay, because limits are established and controls are put in place. If fear prevents that child from ever trying to ride that bike, he or she will never learn. The child has to take some level of risk in order to learn. Once the child masters riding with training wheels, then you repeat the process without the training wheels. Then you move from grass to pavement; and so on and so on.
So when all is said and done, problem solving is like learning to ride a bike: once you learn how to do it effectively, you will never forget it.
Over the coming months we will be running a series of case studies to illustrate some real-life problem-solving success stories. Please share your problem-solving success stories with us; we would love to hear about them.
For more information on Wall Consulting Group checkout our website on: wallconsultinggroup.com and follow us on Twitter @wall_cgi
Fear is relative, therefore you must establish your comfort level. How confident do you need to be to take that next step? Some people might be comfortable with 80 per cent certainty that they are right while others might need 90 per cent certainty or more. When you determine your own confidence level, take that step forward at a safe pace, allowing for a sober second opinion from a trusted colleague or friend if needed. When you are more likely wrong than right, stay put or step back, reassess and recalibrate as necessary; also allowing for a sober second opinion.
Don’t let fear of failure stop you. Failure is an opportunity to learn, as long as you establish a safe environment for failure and put limits and controls on the allowable level of failure. In this environment, you don’t have to know everything now, each step brings the next step into focus.
Inevitably there will be times when you stop and you simply don’t know what to do next. If you don’t have the answers, you just need to know how to find them. Finding answers becomes easier if you break your big problem into multiple smaller problems and attack them individually.
You should never allow what you don’t know to stop you from moving forward with what you do know. Exploit what you don’t know as an opportunity to make someone else an expert and you the student. You might be surprised by what you will learn.
Cycling through this process over and over eventually moves everything into the known category, and the unknowns just whittle away. Becoming paralyzed by a problem comes from the illogical desire to be self-sufficient and get to a 100 per cent confidence level before each step, which leads to few or no steps being taken.
Let's try this logic on a 6 year-old you are teaching to ride a shiny new bicycle. You know that this child does not yet know how to ride a bicycle. You know that everyone who learns how to ride a bike never forgets. These are things you know. These are things a 4 year-old can comprehend when you explain them. You can also explain that falling down is okay. Everyone falls down when they learn. You can create a safe environment where the child is wearing protective gear, the bike has training wheels, and the child is riding it on a grassy field. Failure is okay, because limits are established and controls are put in place. If fear prevents that child from ever trying to ride that bike, he or she will never learn. The child has to take some level of risk in order to learn. Once the child masters riding with training wheels, then you repeat the process without the training wheels. Then you move from grass to pavement; and so on and so on.
So when all is said and done, problem solving is like learning to ride a bike: once you learn how to do it effectively, you will never forget it.
Over the coming months we will be running a series of case studies to illustrate some real-life problem-solving success stories. Please share your problem-solving success stories with us; we would love to hear about them.
For more information on Wall Consulting Group checkout our website on: wallconsultinggroup.com and follow us on Twitter @wall_cgi
Builders vs. Maintainers
Wall Consulting Group
The magnificent grand pianos that grace the stages of concert halls, jazz clubs and music schools are handcrafted by artisans who bend wood, string wire and glue felt to build each instrument. Once the piano builders are done and the finished pianos leave the workshop, it’s up to piano tuners to maintain them; making regular adjustments to ensure they continue sounding the way the builders intended.
In any endeavour, be it providing a musician with a consistently exemplary concert grand piano or providing an asset manager with a best practice back office, there’s a certain harmony in knowing which roles are best left to builders and which are the purview of maintainers.
As well, knowing where you fall on the spectrum of builders and maintainers can help you manage your own career goals and expectations.
Those of us in the investment operations field have likely worked with some great builders and some equally great maintainers. But builders and maintainers are only at their best when they perform roles that are the right fit for their personalities. Leaving a builder in a maintenance role for too long can sometimes lead to boredom and stagnation. Someone with a builder’s personality might need a daily dose of risks and challenges that they won’t face in a maintenance role. Eventually the need for something new trumps all other needs and they tune out and move on. Those piano builders so used to working with their hands and tools to proudly create each unique instrument might not find it so satisfying to spend hours every few weeks monotonously adjusting each wire to maintain the instrument’s sound.
Likewise, putting a maintainer in a builder’s role for too long is likely to create unhealthy levels of stress and anxiety. Imagine the average piano tuner trying to build a piano from scratch. The piano makers at the venerable Steinway and Sons factories famously build the instruments from memory and experience, not a blueprint or plan in sight. Put a maintainer in a builder’s role without a blueprint and you’ll have a person likely paralyzed by fear and slow to make decisions.
Of course, some of the best piano tuners are also technicians capable of practically rebuilding damaged instruments. Similarly, in the world of finance, people are rarely completely just a builder or just a maintainer; they fit somewhere on a spectrum. Roles are also rarely exclusively one or the other; they too fit on a spectrum.
This means it is imperative that when you are designing roles, recruiting talent or motivating employees to achieve success, you need consider not just technical skills, but also personality match for the specific position.
Know where you fit and you will become happier in your career. Know how to define your team members and you will place the right people in the right jobs to be successful. Most importantly, identify the mismatch when it occurs and fix it right away. Doing that will help you to hit the right chord for success in any endeavour.
For more information on Wall Consulting Group checkout our website on:
www.wallconsultinggroup.com and follow us on Twitter @wall_cgi
Monday, April 4, 2016
How to Succeed as a Chief Growth Officer
But how exactly does a CGO implement new growth strategies? Here are a few touchstones to consider.
Mine for gold. Too often, companies think about growth in the context of quarterly earnings, or in terms of meeting current demand. The benefit of having a CGO is the ability to develop a long-term vision. “When I think about growth,” says Scott Davis, a Kellogg alumnus and Chief Growth Officer of the brand and marketing consultancy Prophet, “I think about what customer segments I want to go after, which geographies I want to enter, and what kind of experiences I want to create. It’s not just about growing two to three percent; it’s about taking dramatic leaps—ten, fifteen, twenty percent.”
For this kind of growth, a CGO must look for opportunities across all functions and geographies. Khosla calls this “mining for gold.” “You find your company’s hidden strengths—those islands of excellence—and you figure out how to expand them, how to make them scalable.” These islands of excellence could be unusual products, surprising processes, or business units or markets that are beating benchmarks.
Be ready to write blank checks. Part of the CGO’s job is to build cross-functional teams that can meet shifts in global demand. But he or she should also be willing to invest heavily when the timing is right and the vision is clear. “I call it the ‘blank check’ approach,” Khosla says. “When you offer the leader of a team unlimited resources, often that leader becomes more accountable, and they are even more likely to achieve the impossible.”
"You have to think of yourself as being an advocate for the consumer.”
Khosla experienced this first hand while serving as president of Kraft Food’s developing-markets group. When Kraft decided to put more resources behind its most promising brands—Tang in Brazil, Cadbury in India, Oreos in China—profits soared in just a few years.
But these projects were not sure-fire wins from the outset. For example, in the early 2000s, Tang had fallen mightily from its heyday as the drink of astronauts. Efforts to revive the brand by selling pre-mixed Tang, even Tang-flavored yogurt, had only limited success. And yet Kraft realized that Tang nonetheless had a lot going for it—including name recognition and an on-trend “green” supply chain—and invested anyway.
“Pursuing growth is about being able to take those kinds of risks,” Khosla says.
Be an advocate for the consumer. Growth is not just about identifying new markets to enter. It is also about staying in tune with the customers you already have, or could have. “You can’t have growth without demand,” Davis says, “so you always have to be asking yourself, What is the market looking for? What kinds of offerings don’t exist yet? You have to think of yourself as being an advocate for the consumer.”
As Davis sees it, part of what it means to be an advocate for the consumer is to find out what the pain points are. “It’s amazing how much this can unlock growth,” he says.
Consider Prophet’s campaign to help turn T-Mobile’s fortunes around. In 2011, following a failed merger, T-Mobile was struggling to keep up with the competition, shedding customers left and right. “When we came in, we developed a growth strategy specifically around pain points,” Davis says. “We found there were major problems with trust and there was frustration over contract policies.” This focus on the customer led to T-Mobile’s “Un-carrier strategy,” which eliminated long-term contracts and promised a more flexible wireless service. T-Mobile’s revenues increased dramatically over the next three years.
“When there’s someone in your organization whose job it is to listen to customers—including customers across the entire industry—it’s easier to see what needs to be changed,” Davis says. “This is something we began to see with the shifting role of the [Chief Marketing Officer]. CMOs are finally being offered a seat at the adults’ table. The rise of the Chief Growth Officer is an extension of that trend.”
Know your business. Khosla points out that, contrary to popular belief, the role of CGO does not necessarily require a marketing background. As an example, he points to Mark Clouse, the CGO of Mondelez International, who never served as CMO. “Companies look for people with commercial experience, people who can actually run a business,” Khosla says.
Davis agrees that the CGO should be someone with a finger on the pulse of the company. “You had better understand how the business works, because you have to be able to work with the entire leadership team. Your case for change will need to pass the CFO test.”
Compel and inspire. “But you also have to compel,” Davis says. “It’s an interesting blend of strategy and inspiration,” he continues. “Your ideas need to be economically viable, but they also have to be visionary. You have to convince your organization to make changes based on demand, which sometimes means being a provocateur.”
In many ways, Davis says, it can be liberating to concentrate on growth alone. “You don’t always have to be thinking about the same trade-offs that other executives might have to think about.” Ideally, this means the CGO is free to challenge the status quo in order to discover new pathways to growth. But it also leads to a heightened sense of responsibility and purpose. “You always have to be listening, and thinking about what’s next,” Davis says. “And you have to make a very strong case.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)