Tuesday, December 10, 2013

7 Reasons Employees Don't Trust Their Leaders

Employees-don't-trust-leaders 

As the world mourns the loss of Nelson Mandela and commemorates his greatness as a leader, we would do well to remember that one of the  many hallmarks of his leadership was trust.    The greatest leaders in the world gravitated toward Mr. Mandela because he was genuinely trustworthy and his purpose was to support peace, prosperity and unity not only in South Africa – but throughout the world.   Mandela was able to lead people in ways that many find impossible to do. As he famously said, “It always seems impossible until it’s done.”

Unfortunately, trust is in rare supply these days.  People are having trouble trusting each other, according to an AP-GfK poll conducted in November 2013, which found that Americans are suspicious of each other in their everyday encounters.   Only one-third of Americans say most people can be trusted – down from half who felt that way in 1972, when the General Social Survey first asked the question.  Forty years later, in 2013, a record high of nearly two-thirds says “you can’t be too careful” in dealing with people.

This same sentiment can be carried over into the workplace, where employees want their leaders to be more trustworthy and transparent.   Employees have grown tired of unexpected outcomes resulting from the lack of preparation.  They want to be informed of any change management efforts before – not after the fact.   Employees desire to know what is expected of them and be given the opportunity to reinvent themselves, rather than be told they are not qualified for new roles and responsibilities and can no longer execute their functions successfully.

Leaders are challenged between informing their employees of the entire truth and holding back certain realities so as not to unnecessarily scare   people or lose top-talent.   More and more leaders today are being placed into uncomfortable moral dilemmas because they are attempting to salvage their own jobs while trying to maintain the trust and loyalty of their employees.

The growing tensions between leaders and their employees are creating productivity challenges as uncertainty becomes the new normal in the workplace.  Furthermore, leaders are beginning to lose control of their own identities and effectiveness as their employees begin to lose trust in their intentions because of hidden agendas and political maneuvering – casting clouds of doubt over their futures.

Employees just want the truth.  They have learned that the old ways of doing things just don’t apply (as much) anymore and more than ever they need their leaders to have their backs.  Unfortunately, many leaders are operating in survival mode and don’t have the sphere of influence they once had; without leaders to sponsor and mentor them, high-potential employees must now figure out the changing terrain on their own.

Here are seven early warning signs to look out for so you can course-correct when employees are having trouble trusting their leaders:

1.  Lack Courage
Leaders that don’t stand up for what they believe in are difficult to respect and trust.   Too many leaders today battle the gulf between assimilation and authenticity.   They waste too much of their valuable time trying to act like other leaders in the organization – rather than attempting to establish their own identity and leadership style.   This is why less than 15% of leaders have defined and live their personal brand.

Perhaps leaders don’t believe that their employees are paying attention to this behavior – but they are intently observing.    Employees are always in tune to what their leaders are doing and how they manage themselves.   Employees know that if their leaders are not savvy enough to move themselves into a position of greater influence, it will make it that much more difficult for   them to get noticed and discovered as well.  The influence of a leader carries a lot of weight when it comes to how their colleagues judge and evaluate the potential of their employees.

When leaders lack the courage to enable their full potential and that of others, it becomes a challenge to trust their judgment, self-confidence, self-awareness and overall capabilities.

2.  Hidden Agendas
Leaders that are too politically savvy can be viewed as devious and inauthentic.  Employees want to follow leaders who are less about the politics and more about how to accomplish goals and objectives.   While being politically savvy is important, leaders must be careful not to give their employees the impression of orchestrating hidden agendas.

Employees want to believe that their leaders are focused on the betterment of the team.  If this requires well-intentioned political maneuvering to advance team goals and objectives, then great.  However, if it comes across that a leader is solely intent on protecting themselves and their own personal agendas – trust from the team will be lost quickly and difficult to recapture.

3.  Self-Centered
Hidden agendas make it difficult to trust that a leader’s intentions and decision-making are not self-centered.  When a leader is only looking out for themselves and lacks any sense of commitment to the advancement of their employees – this shuts-off employees quickly.
 
Great leaders are great coaches and are always looking to help their employees grow and prosper.   When leaders lack any real desire to mentor, coach and/or guide the career advancement of their employees – it becomes increasingly difficult for employees to trust them.   I’ve often said that leaders can’t go at it alone.   But when leaders are too disruptive, their employees sense that they are in it for themselves and/or don’t trust the talent around them.

Also, when leaders are self-centered their ego stands in the way of advancing others – further eroding trust.

4.  Reputation Issues 

When people begin to speak negatively about their leader, it makes it more difficult for others to trust their intentions and vision.  For example, look at what has happened to President Barrack Obama since December 2009 when his approval rating was 69%.
  
  According to the Rasmussen Reports, four years later (as of December 7th), Obama’s approval rating is now at 43%.  Nearly a 30% decline has created massive disruption to his reputation and many who have followed and supported him for years are now having troubling trusting him.

If you conducted a comparative approval rating survey in your workplace, how would your employees rate the performance of your leaders?

Every leader must be aware that they are constantly being evaluated and thus they can never grow complacent.   When they do, this begins to negatively impact their reputation and the trust employees have in their leadership.

5.  Inconsistent Behavior
People are more inclined to trust those who are consistent with their behavior.   Isn’t it easy to begin questioning one’s motives/judgment when they are inconsistent?  For example, I’ve worked with clients who appear to be on the same page – only to notice that they begin to disconnect when they believe that the direction of a project is not allowing them to mobilize their own agendas.   In order words, when everyone but the leader is on board with a strategy – you begin to wonder if their intentions are to support the organization’s advancement or their own.

Leaders who are consistent with their approach and intentions are those who can be trusted.   This is why so many leaders need to refresh their leadership style before they lose the trust of their employees.

6.  Don’t Get Their Hands Dirty
Leaders must touch the business, just as much as they lead it.    When leaders are over-delegating and not getting their hands dirty – employees begin to question whether or not their leader actually knows what is required to get the job done.    Distrust amongst employees begins to rise.

Though leaders cannot be expected to have all of the answers – they should not play at arms-length either. The 21st century leader must be more high-touch in order to effectively evaluate the business and coach-up their employees.    How else can a leader establish the standards to maintain and improve workplace performance?

Are your leaders getting their hands dirty or are they merely acting the part?

Leaders must earn the trust of their employees and stop believing that their titles, roles and responsibilities automatically warrant trust from others.

7.  Lack a Generous Purpose
When a leader doesn’t genuinely have your best interests at heart, it’s difficult to trust them.  When leaders are not grateful for your performance efforts – and are always attempting to squeeze every bit of effort they can out of you – it’s difficult to trust that they have intentions to be more efficient, resourceful and collaborative.

Employees don’t ever want to feel taken advantage of – especially during a time when everyone is being asked to do more with less.   Leaders must be more appreciative of their employees and more mindful of their endeavors.

Leaders who lack a generous purpose and are not compassionate towards their employees are difficult to trust. How can leaders expect their employees to give them everything they’ve got to increase their performance impact when they are not willing to do the same?

These seven behavioral traits are becoming much more prevalent in the workplace and if leaders fail to course-correct they will be putting their employees in positions of increased risk – disrupting their focus and the momentum of their careers.

This is what today leaders must consider: how to lead in new ways that focus less on oneself, but more on the betterment of a healthier whole. Leaders must enable positive social change through ethical innovation   – what I call “innovation humanity.”

Let’s honor Mandela’s courage and compassion by letting his leadership inspire us now as it did throughout the life he lived with such generous purpose.


 

The Seven Pursuits of Leadership

Lion

Dan Rockwell

You may grow weary of a life of pursuit but what’s the alternative?
Spend yourself in pursuit or waste yourself in ease. Fatigue from pursuit is the noblest form of exhaustion.
“At its essence, leadership is pursuit…” Mike Myatt

Achievement is never as satisfying as pursuit. After attainment comes more pursuit or grow lazy and unfulfilled. Achieving your dream is joyful sadness.

Pursue the pursuit.

Achievement as an end gives birth to complacency or despair. But, pursuit gives meaning to the journey.

Restless:
Pursue that which is elusive. Be single minded about pressing forward but be sure you know what direction is forward. Uncertainty gives vitality to pursuit.
Leadership requires restlessness.
Six foolish pursuits:
  1. Ease.
  2. Power.
  3. Authority.
  4. Wealth. Life consumed with getting ultimately collapses on itself.
  5. Success.
  6. Conformity.
Seven pursuits of leadership:
  1. Clarity or fog prevails.
  2. Creativity or the mundane.
  3. Talent or isolation.
  4. Change or apathy.
  5. Wisdom or chase distractions.
  6. Character or lose integrity.
  7. Purpose or lose your destiny.
(Adapted from, Hacking Leadership, by Mike Myatt)
Mike’s new book, Hacking Leadership, got me thinking about my favorite leadership pursuits.
  1. Service. Those committed to bring value always find opportunity.
  2. Development. Grow yourself and others. Develop as you serve. Don’t wait.
  3. Curiosity. The future is created in the pursuit of what doesn’t exist.
  4. Optimism. Believe hard work, adapting as you go, and persistence pay off.
  5. Better. Perfection chokes. Better sets free.
Six tips for the journey:
  1. Focus on what you’ve learned more than how you screwed up.
  2. Be happy with progress but unhappy with attainment.
  3. Control what you can control and let everything else go.
  4. Chase rabbits once in a while.
  5. Find companions.
  6. Think more about where you are going than where you have been.
What are the top pursuits of leadership?
What tips for the journey do you have?

Has Your Leadership Style Changed?

transformation


Source: Dan Rockwell
 
How has your leadership changed? My wife brought the topic up yesterday. I turned the topic back to her. “How do you think I’ve changed?”

She said, “You’re more of a leader and less of a controller.” I didn’t take offense at the suggestion that I’m a control freak. I was and still feel the inclination. Perhaps it’s necessary as long as it’s managed.

Release:
Successful leaders release rather than control.

Leaders understand where others want to go and find alignment between personal and organizational vision. I used to believe leadership was about me. Now I believe it’s about them and their values. Shared values enable people to find alignment with each other.

Releasing is more joyful and less stressful.

Conversations are more about others and less about me. Ego plays a part in making this shift. Needing the spotlight prevents leaders from focusing on others.

Managing emotion matters:
Releasing others requires emotional control. Tempering your emotions gives room for others. Strong emotion causes others to pull back or feel the need to conform. But calm leaders provide space for others.

Small doses of strong emotion are effective but calm optimism works better over the long haul. I enjoy heated discussion but it intimidates some.  They close down. Lowering my tone, intensity, and volume lets others speak up.

If you’re not emotionally expressive, you may need an opposite approach. People want to know how you feel but they don’t want to be bowled over.

Simplicity:
I’m more committed to simplicity than ever. Complexity makes leaders feel important, but success requires a series of simple, small wins achieved at regular intervals. Momentum is a series of small wins.
Simplicity releases. Complexity paralyzes.

How has your leadership changed over the years?

Monday, December 9, 2013

Culture Change and Leadership

post

Corporate Culture can make or break your business. Companies with an adaptive culture that is aligned to their business goals routinely outperform their competitors. To achieve success, you need to figure out what your culture is, decide what it should be, and move everyone toward the desired culture. But changing an organization’s culture is the most challenging task you’ll face as a CEO or senior executive.

Regardless of your industry, here are elements that will help change your company’s culture successfully:
  • Change the Leaders or Change the Leaders. The CEO and senior team must be willing to change their individual and collective ways of working and their personal behaviors to match the new cultural behaviors required inside the company.
Companies with an adaptive culture that is aligned to their business goals routinely outperform their competitors.
  • An aligned senior team that accepts the accountability and responsibility to lead the culture change. If any one individual, say the CFO, believes that he has real work to do and the rest of you can deal with the ‘soft stuff’, and chooses not to accept to actively support the culture change effort, the change won’t take hold. It’s all in or all out!
  • Behaviors, Behaviors, Behaviors. Frame the new culture and your new requirements for work around observable behaviors, not values.
  • Overcome the critical mass of inertia. Unless you get the critical mass of ‘undecided or cautious’ to change, the inertia of the old culture will bring the entire change process to a grinding halt. One way is to enroll those key influential employees in the organization who are most respected and enthusiastic about the culture change and train them to be internal facilitators, mentors, coaches and guides.
Corporate Culture can make or break your business.
  • Redesign the daily business processes so that they promote the behaviors required of the new culture. And place a special emphasis on redesigning the HR processes to better match the new culture desired. Reevaluate your promotion and development policies; do they match the new culture desired?
  • Measure, Readjust, and Measure Again. While measuring the overall impact of culture change is not an easy task, it is absolutely necessary to find those elements of the culture that can be measured and tracked on a relatively frequent basis. If your changes are taking hold, these indictors should move.
There is no shortcut to reshaping culture. Miss any one of these elements, or try to cut back on them, and you will definitely fail. And by the way, it’s going to take a lot more leadership time than you originally planned. How much? How about 40% of the time of senior executives devoted to reshaping the culture! If you can’t commit, don’t start.

leverage cover front 1
Don’t forget to check out John’s awesome book!
 
 
John R. Childress
John R. Childress is a senior executive advisor with more than 35 years experience working with senior executive teams and global organizations on the role of culture, performance, leadership and strategy execution. An effective public speaker, Childress is the author of FASTBREAK: The CEO’s Guide to Strategy Execution. His writings bring best practices into a synthesis of sage advice for the CEO and business leader committed to improving culture and performance. His new book LEVERAGE: The CEO’s Guide to Corporate Culture will be released on 01 December 2013.

Why Tinkering Around is the Key to Success


 

Here is a quick way to judge whether your company will continue to be successful: can you tell your CEO that you spent the morning tinkering around with an idea? If the answer is yes, you are in good shape. If no, start looking for another job.

Successful companies know that the path to innovation isn't a straight line. Profitable growth is a messy, roller-coaster process that involves almost as many setbacks as victories. If you succeed in everything you do, you aren't aiming nearly high enough.

I get frustrated when companies talk and talk and talk about innovation, while simultaneously making it nearly impossible for their employees to tinker around. Tinkering is what drives innovation, not talking.

Tinkering lets you try different combinations, to stumble upon outcomes you never expected, and to experiment until you figure out how to get predictable results.

Last month, I tried to write a convincing article about the business value of tinkering around, and failed miserably. Not many people read my story, and the few who did missed my point. (This was my fault, not theirs.)

This was all a bit ironic, because my point was that most innovation is the result of persistent tinkering. So I tinkered with my approach, and today I am trying again. 

Big companies hate tinkering, and many small ones do, too
When companies get too big and too bureaucratic, they abhor the idea of tinkering around with a product, service or process. To them, it sounds amateurish. You can almost hear these lumbering giants saying: we are too professional to get on the floor like kids and keep taking stuff apart and putting it back together in a slightly different combination.

The same can be true for small, slowly growing businesses. You know the ones I mean, those that had 12 employees in 2003, and still have 12 employees. They do things the same way year after year, and almost never tinker around with the way their business operates.

I've resisted the impulse to talk about famous innovators in this piece, because that would imply that tinkering around is only for inventors seeking to get rich. To the contrary, tinkering around is for everyone. It's a way to improve your resume, refine a cover letter, learn a new 
language, and take five strokes off your golf game. 

Posted by:Bruce Kasanoff

Sunday, December 8, 2013

David Larcker: “Lonely at the Top” Resonates for Most CEOs

Nearly two-thirds of CEOs do not receive outside leadership advice, but nearly all want it.
“It’s lonely at the top” appears to be truer than ever, according to a new study conducted by the Center for Leadership Development and Research (CLDR) at Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance, and The Miles Group. Nearly two-thirds of CEOs do not receive coaching or leadership advice from outside consultants or coaches, and almost half of senior executives are not receiving any either, the survey reveals.

“What’s interesting is that nearly 100% of CEOs in the survey responded that they actually enjoy the process of receiving coaching and leadership advice, so there is real opportunity for companies to fill in that gap,” says David F. Larcker, who led the research team and is James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting and Morgan Stanley Director of CLDR at Stanford GSB.

“Given how vitally important it is for the CEO to be getting the best possible counsel, independent of their board, in order to maintain the health of the corporation, it’s concerning that so many of them are ‘going it alone,’” says Stephen Miles, CEO of The Miles Group. “Even the best-of-the-best CEOs have their blind spots and can dramatically improve their performance with an outside perspective weighing in.”

More than 200 CEOs, board directors, and senior executives of North American public and private companies were polled in the 2013 Executive Coaching Survey that Stanford University and The Miles Group conducted this spring. The research studied what kind of leadership advice CEOs and their top executives are — and aren’t — receiving, and the skills that are being targeted for improvement.

Key findings from the survey include:

Shortage of Advice Exists at the Top

Nearly 66% of CEOs do not receive coaching or leadership advice from outside consultants or coaches, while 100% of them stated that they are receptive to making changes based on feedback. Nearly 80% of directors said that their CEO is receptive to coaching. “If CEOs are willing to be coached and make changes based on coaching, it stands to reason that companies and boards should make this happen,” says Professor Larcker.

CEOs are Looking to be Coached

When asked “Whose decision was it for you to receive coaching?” 78% of CEOs said it was their own idea. Twenty-one percent said that coaching was the board chairman’s idea. Miles sees this as a positive trend: “Becoming CEO doesn’t mean that you suddenly have all the answers, and these top executives realize that there is room for growth for everyone. We are moving away from coaching being perceived as ‘remedial’ to where it should be: something that improves performance, similar to how elite athletes use a coach.”

Coaching “Progress” is Largely Kept Private

More than 60% of CEOs responded that the progress they are making in their coaching sessions is kept between themselves and their coach; only a third said that this information is shared with the board of directors. “As coaching is starting to lose its stigma, more of this secrecy is being removed,” says Miles. “Although much of the coaching discussion should be treated confidentially,” Professor Larcker adds, “keeping the board informed of progress can improve CEO/board relations.”

How to Handle Conflict Ranks as Highest Area of Concern for CEOs

When asked which is the biggest area for their own personal development, nearly 43% of CEOs rated “conflict management skills” the highest. “How to manage effectively through conflict is clearly one of the top priorities for CEOs, as they are juggling multiple constituencies every day,” says Miles. “When you are in the CEO role, most things that come to your desk only get there because there is a difficult decision to be made — which often has some level of conflict associated with it. Stakeholder overload is a real burden for today’s CEO, who must deftly learn how to negotiate often conflicting agendas.”

Boards are Eager for CEOs to Improve Talent Development

The top two areas board directors say their CEOs need to work on are mentoring skills/developing internal talent and sharing leadership and delegation skills. “The high ranking of these areas among board respondents shows a real recognition of the importance of the talent bench,” says Professor Larcker. “Boards are placing a keener focus on succession planning and development, and are challenging their CEOs to keep this front and center. However, there is still a long way to go in the area of succession planning for most companies, especially as you get further down the reporting structure.”
  
Top Areas That CEOs Use Coaching to Improve
  • Sharing leadership/delegation
  • Conflict management
  • Team building
  • Mentoring
Bottom of the list:
  • Motivational skills
  • Compassion/empathy
  • Persuasion skills
“A lot of people steer away from coaching some of the less tangible skills because they are uncomfortable with touching on these areas or really don’t have the capability to do it,” says Miles. “These skills are more nuanced and actually more difficult to coach because many people are more sensitive about these areas. However, when combined with the ‘harder’ skills, improving a CEO’s ability to motivate and inspire can really make a difference in his or her overall effectiveness.”

Saturday, December 7, 2013

A Business Shouldn't Be A One-Person Show

Patrick Hull

Entrepreneurs are ambitious people. When we see a problem, we want to be the one to fix it. But it doesn’t always work. To use a baseball analogy, if you’re trying to cover all the bases by yourself, you’re going to give up a lot of runs. Learning how to delegate and build an effective team around my vision has been one of the most important lessons I’ve learned in my career.

When I tried to do everything myself with my first companies, a lot of things began to slip. I was stressed and didn’t manage my time effectively. The result: both my performance and, more importantly, the company’s performance were affected.

Since those early days, I’ve increasingly relied on delegating responsibilities. Right now I’m in the soft-launch stage for two new companies. I understand that I can’t handle all of the aspects of these companies by myself. That’s why I’ve built teams around me to help launch and grow the new businesses. This way I can focus on the strategy, financing, and marketing aspects of the companies. I’m doing what I enjoy and adding value by focusing on the areas in which I excel.

If an entrepreneur wants to be successful, I believe that person has to delegate to a team. As I mentioned in a previous post about building teams, it all starts with the following question: What skills do I lack?

You have to be honest with yourself and the answer to that question is going to help you identify the roles you must fill. At the very least, I recommend you get a good lawyer, accountant, and banker. These people can help you protect your company, ensure its viability, and finance your idea. You also may realize that you’re lacking other skills instead, such as marketing or sales. Look for professionals who have the skill set you need and have experience and/or connections in your target markets.

If money is tight — and it often is when a business first launches — consider offering some equity for services or barter with others who have skills that you need on your team. If you’re hesitant to hire someone as a fulltime employee, consider an independent contractor relationship. For example, when I was running GetLoaded.com, we required a lot of data-entry so I hired several data-entry people who worked as independent contractors. They could work remotely and I saved money through this arrangement. I explored the role of independent contractors in a post from July and recommend you review it if you want to pursue this approach.

Ultimately, the importance of delegating tasks comes down to helping make your company successful. When you don’t delegate, you waste time and don’t stay focused on your primary responsibilities. This isn’t just an issue for entrepreneurs, either. A recent article in the Harvard Business Review reported on a simple solution for how we can become more productive: delegate tasks. Researchers found that knowledge workers spend 41% of their time on discretionary activities that offer little personal satisfaction and could be handled competently by others.

The message is clear for entrepreneurs and it’s a message I’ve taken to heart. Don’t be afraid to delegate tasks because you can’t do it all yourself.