The owners of Book City, one of Toronto's independent book chains, announced recently that they would be closing the doors to their flagship store after 40 years. As a final salute, CBC Metro Morning interviewed the store’s third generation owner, who shared the heaviness of that heart wrenching decision.
The reporter reminisced about how stores serve as land marks in our neighbourhoods and Book City was no exception: its iconic yellow logo brand was appreciated by Torontonians.
While in recent years customers have migrated to online book stores, the question remains: is there anything the family business could have done differently? Could succession planning have helped preserve the company’s legacy?
“For the most part it is easier, and generally more fulfilling to work ‘in’ your business than ‘on’ your business, so entrepreneurial families continue to dwell on the day-to-day tasks that come from operating a business,” says David Simpson, founder of the Ivey Business Families Centre. “Planning for future transitions, while always somewhere on the planning horizon, never seem to get done.”
Many first generation - let alone third generation (3G) - business owners have gone the same route. They stick to a dated business model that served them well in the past; after all, change is risky.
Those who step into the family business, may become trapped by a significant and public brand created and developed by generation one and two. They put grandpa on a pedestal, his oil painting is in the boardroom and refuse to refresh the model.
Mr. Simpson agrees: “There may also be a tendency for second generation (or third) to have guilty feelings if the challenging questions that come with considering transitions – including potentially selling a business. This comes in conflict with the feelings of protecting a legacy that was provided by an earlier generation.”
Yet, the entrepreneurial first generation would probably be the first to say “sell the business.”
“I tend to remind this generation that the greatest legacy is to remain as entrepreneurial as the founders, and ensure a strong family tradition that includes knowing when a business doesn’t fit the times,” adds Mr. Simpson.
To help business families remain entrepreneurial, he offers the following advice:
1. Once a year, ask the hard question: “If we were starting out today, would this be the business our family chooses to be in?” This forces a family to remind themselves that a business takes time, energy, talent, capital and most of all relevance. Take out the emotional attachment. If your family was in the buggy whip business as cars were arriving on roads, there would be little point in continuing as is. This question provides the nudge to reinvent the business, perhaps into a travel accessories and suitcase retailer.
2. If we conclude that this is a good business to be in, ask yourself this: “Are we the right ones to manage or steward the business further?” To survive in the global market, growth is vitally necessary. Expansion capital is available for companies over a revenue size threshold, and a family business can bring on board a professional CEO capable of managing a larger enterprise. There is no need to remain stagnant. The skill-fit question forces families to think like owners, and be less concerned about viewing the business as a
source of family jobs. The best leadership of a business will change over time as requirements change, and families need to look to what serves the business best.
3. Let outsiders inside your tent. Mr. Simpson says outside eyes are critical: “Overall, remember that families often view their businesses as their babies, and human parents tend to be ill-equipped to value their babies. We either overestimate the ‘uniqueness’ of our child or are often too hard on our kids and overlook their hidden value as a result.” Yet, so few family businesses take on an advisory board because they believe no one will understand their business as well as they do. Ensure that the business has an outside advisory board, or an active fiduciary board or at least a mentor with skills in the particular field. Engaging an advisory firm early and sharing your hopes and dreams will also ensure that a competent firm with transition experience can give you the hard reality of the day which helps families make decisions.
Jacoline Loewen is a director at Crosbie & Company, which focuses on succession advice for medium-sized enterprises, family businesses and closely held private companies. Crosbie develops customized strategies, particularly in relation to sale of companies, M&A, financing and corporate strategy matters. Ms. Loewen is also the author of Money Magnet: How to Attract Investors to Your Business.
Showing posts with label Crosbie & Co.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crosbie & Co.. Show all posts
Monday, March 10, 2014
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
How to make your business more attractive for sale
The dismal
financial results for 2009
no longer need to be included in a company’s
books. For any business looking to sell, this significant milestone
allows
for
a marked improvement
when
potential buyers look at the performance of the past
three years.
The conversation
doesn’t have to
start
with: “We looked at your financial
statements.
What
happened in ’09? Want to
talk about that first?” That
said, there is still a
noticeable gap in valuation expectations between
buyers and
sellers.
“The market downturn stripped out the profits
for private companies and
the survivors reduced and reinvented
their
businesses to add to their top line,” says Bob Gorrie, owner
of Gorrie Marketing Services.
“These owners have put a great deal of sweat equity into
their businesses, and unfortunately
that extra hard work and planning
is not reflected in
their financial results.”
But
as the markets improve,
profits are returning
and owners interested
in selling are watching their industry cycles like hawks for the
upswing, waiting to
get
the
timing right.
A more relevant question for these owners
is “where is my own business in its life cycle?”
For any business
owner contemplating a sale in
the next few years, here
are a few ways to add to the
valuation:
Does your business
have solid management?
The owner may be leaving but
buyers want
to know whether there’s a team
in place with
big goals to
drive the business forward
with
equal
determination.
Having a
succession plan is
critical, but
when Crosbie &
Co. recently conducted
an owners’ survey, it revealed that fewer
than 5 per cent
have a written
document with a strong operator or family member ready to take over.
Owner-operators
have built their lives around
running their businesses
and they do not want
to let that go. This reluctance may prevent them from
seeing the importance of planning for
their own exit
and they will get dinged
on their company sale
price for this omission.
Are your key
processes institutionalized?
“There is the risk that the company incurs a fatal loss
of knowledge and connections upon the exit of the
owner,” the president of
a manufacturing business told
me. “The earn-out
helps,
but two to three years
does not make up for
30 years experience in a company. One
way to mitigate this risk is to bring in a guy like
me.” Paying
a high-quality CEO
for
a few years
will
help the owner of
a windows manufacturer convert
“in the head” knowledge to written processes. “We preserved the knowledge and
demonstrated the existence of a reliable management
team to a potential buyer,” the president added.
Do you know good buyers?
The sale price of a
business is what buyers offer and
when a company is in
the growth part of its
business cycle,
there will be multiple offers and phone
calls from all sorts of interested parties.
“I
know the ‘I’m
comfortable with my business’ owners where the offers to buy have made great
sense,” says
succession planning coach
Janice Lahiti.
“The owners don’t do
it because they think
their ability to
influence a variety
of broader agendas
will diminish.” As the business hits the mature stage
of its life cycle, which
often occurs in tandem
with the owner’s
life cycle, suddenly
the pool of multiple
bidders
dries up and as Janice says: “The owner can
no longer command
the multiples they want.”
The owner
may also
miss
the opportunity to sell to a buyer who
will structure the sale so
that the majority
of the company is purchased but the owner can
keep 20 per
cent
to 30 per cent with a fixed
medium-term buyout
schedule.
They can also
have limited management or
board involvement. This structure keeps
the owner involved mentally and financially in his or her ‘baby’ while
taking some money off the table to free up
time to pursue other interests.
What is
your
opportunity cost,
really?
Melanie
Kau
exited her
successful family business, Mobilia, to take on
the challenge of
running Le Naturiste. “The ‘what next’
after you
have worked
for 15 to 20 years
in a business prevents people from asking themselves the cost of staying where they are because
they are comfortable. I know
what that feels like because I have just been through it.
Therein lies
a great deal of value with the experience the entrepreneur has built
up: sometimes the business is more like a cage than a platform.”
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Canadian SMEs Snapping up U.S. Companies
JOHN LORINC
December 3, 2013
More than five years after the
2008 credit crisis, Canadian M&A activity stubbornly remains well below its
peak 2007 levels. But, while more sluggish than the feeding frenzy of six years
ago, it does look as if acquisitions are starting to pick up the pace again
according to new data compiled by investment bank Crosbie & Company. Over
the past year, Canadian firms have been aggressively snapping up U.S. companies
at much faster rates, culminating in 120 takeovers in 2013 worth almost $32
billion.
Crosbie & Company managing
director Colin Walker notes that the proportion of Canadian acquisitions of
U.S. firms as a total of all foreign acquisitions has fallen by about 10% to
15% in the past decade—proof, he says, that domestic businesses are
increasingly operating in a "fundamentally international" market.
"It shows that Canadian companies have recognized the need to push beyond
[North American] markets over a long period. It's a function of
globalization."
Walker says the Canadian
M&A market is driven primarily by mid-sized firms with transactions worth
less than $150 million. In a typical quarter, he adds, about 40% to 50% of
those deals involve cross-border activity.
According to the 2013 Q3 report
published in The Financial Post, the number of all year-to-date
M&As—which came to an ominous total of 666—is 7% below the same period for
2012 and 11% below the first three quarters of 2011. "Despite weak
activity," Crosbie & Company says, "the value of transactions
increased by 9.7% to $49 billion in the quarter due to a few large
transactions, particularly in the retailing and real estate sectors."
Crosbie also reports that the
number of Canadian acquisitions of foreign firms is outpacing foreign takeovers
of domestic companies by a ratio of 2.2 to 1.
Over the past
decade, says Walker, this "outbound" acquisition activity has been
driven by manufacturers looking to move production to low-cost jurisdictions in
the southern U.S. or Asia. In other cases, such as Constellation Software, a
Toronto firm, companies grow within key market segments by making strategic
acquisitions.
In fact,
Walker says most Canadian companies aren't just looking to boost their revenues
or before-tax profits when they make an international acquisition.
"They're buying that company because of the benefits that it brings, such
as windows on new markets, new products, new manufacturing capability or some
really good people."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)