Jerry Cahn
I teach a course in Business
Strategy for CUNY; among the topics I focus on is growth through global
expansion. A key implication of understanding the “flat world” philosophy, is
to realize that companies need to adopt a transactional approach –one in which
offices anywhere in the world, and not just the traditional HQ in the US or
Europe, can provide key corporate services, such as R&D, marketing and
sales.
We also spend time understanding why
so many top companies have stumbled when trying to serve emerging growth
countries they don’t really understand the needs of local residents to whom
they will market and sell their products. For instance, just recently Walmart,
the leading US retailer, announced earlier this year a retreat from their initial
approach in India, and the need to alter it. They’ve had similar experiences in
other countries.
Ram Charan, the world-renown business
advisor to several Fortune 500 firms, addresses these issues in “Global Tilt; Leading Your Business Through the Great
Economic Power Shift”. He focuses on 2 concepts which we
all should remember regardless of where we’re expanding our companies. Here
are 2 concepts that expanding companies should remember: Outside-In and
Future-Back.
Outside-In refers to the need NOT to focus on the expansion solely
based on your competencies (strengths), but to also recognize the need to see
it from the point of view of the countries’ customers for whom buying values
are different than those of our domestic customers.
For instance, when Nabisco tried to figure out why their Oreo cookies were
leading their market in China as they have for years in the US, they
realized that they needed to understand customers better. It turns out these
new customers didn’t like round cookies nor did they associate “milk and
cookies”.
A sweeter, smaller and wafer-like cookie was introduced to this
market and became #1. Procter
& Gamble has done the same in trying to understand how customers in other
cultures look at several products, including Tide and Head &
Shoulders.
Future-Back refers to focusing on the end result, and then working
backward to see what really would lead to getting there, Steven Covey address
the same concept in the last of his The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: start
with the end in mind. Ram takes it to the truly strategic level: extend your
time horizon as you assess the world and imagine what the competitive landscape
will be as much as 20 years in the future.
The key is to work backward by
thinking of the implications for the present. For instance, if 20 years from
now there will be more cars being used and sold in China than the US, thinking
through the segmentations that are likely to be there at that time guide you on
current decisions.
In India, Tata Motors introduced a
car several years ago give families of 3-4 people who travel in the morning to
school and work a safer yet affordable option than their motorcycle. So
instead of buying a $1500 motorcycle, Tata offered a $2500 car, which was very
basic; no air-conditioning, no dashboard storage compartment, etc. The Nano
received lots of publicity as a major breakthrough.
This year, Tata revealed that sales
for the car are so few that they are losing money on it. Why? They concluded
that if people are going to spend more money on a car, they want one with some
creature comforts. So, they are upgrading it and will price it now at
$3500. A few weeks later, Ford announced that it was introducing a new
car for the emerging markets – priced at $10,000.
Ford’s decision suggests that car
buyers want more than basic performance plus few comforts and that the new Nano
will still not be sufficiently attractive for the Indian target.
As you think of expanding your
company to new markets – domestically or internationally doesn’t matter. You
need to take these two concepts into account when planning. Are
you? Share your stories and experiences with us.
No comments:
Post a Comment